I restored alt text that you removed on the prior edit. It see that the alt text feature may no longer be working, which might be behind the automated removal, but in that case the feature description should be changed as well. Can you clarify what is happening here? — Quondum05:47, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for catching that mistake. I have checked and the alt text is indeed functional and working. I assumed this not to be the case because it was not mentioned in the other references that I had consulted. Cacycle (talk) 11:29, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. The "feature" that I had in mind was that when the cursor hovered over the image, the alt text would pop up, but on trying to trace it, it seems this must have been a "bug" in my memory (confusion with wikilinks or somesuchlike), and the only functionality mentioned at WP:ALT seems to be working fine. — Quondum12:29, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beeturia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
In the Wikipedia chemistry project we have occasional problems with students that are assigned by semi-naive teaching assistants to write articles. The problem is that these students and their "mentors" are unsophisticated and the material they seek to submit is often of modest quality from the perspective of notability, sources, and technical details. The question is what kind of on-line Wiki-like projects exist for such people (freshman honor students). Perhaps something that is not quite as technically demanding as the chemistry project. There are dozens of very good but young students at my institution looking for a way to contribute something on-line in a wiki-format. They could for example work on Wikibooks or Wikiversity, writing up gen chem content or such. I confess to being completely ignorant of these venues, but am aware that you are a contributor to them. Do you have any ideas? --Smokefoot (talk) 21:01, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Coronene chemical structure.png listed for deletion
I teach high school chemistry.I want to use your structural formulas in my class computer lessons. I copy, but when I paste into a program, it has a black background.What am I doing wrong?
Thank you,
M Weber
MWeber32schools.nyc.gov — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.155.192.6 (talk) 14:26, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Cacycle. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
That consists of: I'm not sure exactly what you changed, but all of a sudden, wikEd is replacing closing comment tags (-->) with whatever the previous character in the comment string is. Example:
<!-- This is a comment -->
is getting changed to
<!-- This is a comment t
Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization consisting of over 28,000 volunteers in more than 100 countries. The collaboration was formed to organize medical scholarship in a systematic way in the interests of evidence-based research: the group conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account. Thank you Cochrane!
If you are stil active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)
Thank you for creating helpful editing tools like wikEd and wikEdDiff. They seriously make my life so much easier, and they integrate so well with the editing interface that I honestly sometimes forget they're not a default part of the Wikimedia software. I have an alt account that I use both for editing from public computers and for editing from my Kindle Fire (which sadly, does not like to play with WikEd) and smartphone. Whenever I log into that account, I'm always a little confused about why half my editing interface is gone until I remember that wikEd is "just" an add-on. Thank you for the improvements you have made to my editing. Happy editing, — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 16:42, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for these nice compliments! Unfortunately, I did not have much time to work on wikEd recently, but that might change in the future... Cacycle (talk) 20:14, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I read you are the person to ask for help about this tool. I'm trying to copy it into the spanish wikipedia. I can't get it to fully work. Could you help me with this? Thanks --Facu89 (talk) 04:56, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Facu89, Lupin's Anti-Vandal Tool (User:Lupin/recent2.js) is is a really old tool that has not been actively maintained for several years. I am not even sure if it is still working on the English Wikipedia. Feel free to ask specific questions, but in general, I think there are much better (and maintained!) tools available nowadays. Sorry, Cacycle (talk) 20:11, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am offering a prize for a fix to WikEd. Have posted the issue here [2]. The problem occur with google chrome latest version. Unable to copy and paste colors across with Firefox. Let me know if you are interested. Else will offer to a wider community. Great program by the way. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 11:58, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The structure you posted, doesnt have a formal charge of 0. There is another possible way to draw the molecular structure of that substance, (lone pair up O, double bond beside C3) which will make the Formal charge =0, this way it will be more correct than your earlier one. Please change it. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.163.107.39 (talk) 11:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Are you talking about File:Propionic_acid_chemical_structure.png? What is "LDS"? That structure actually does have a formal charge of 0. Also, the structure does not show any lone pairs. C3 is the terminal carbon and does not have any double bonds. I am really confused, please could you give me more details so that I can address your concerns? Thanks, Cacycle (talk) 13:18, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bhilai Steel Plant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pitch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It took some time for me to notice your request but I'm pleased to announce that I've just updated Polish translation of wikiEd. Cheers, konrad (talk) 14:26, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Cacycle, I made a small change to wikEdDiff, because it was broken for me (already had been for a while actually). I chose the safest path, basically switching this part back to how it was in an earlier version, and it restored functionality for me. Please improve it as you see fit. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 22:08, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Cacycle. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is wikEdDiff request. Message added 21:58, 3 July 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Data comparison, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Program code. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi,
I am a French-speaking wikimédiens , i saw the utility of the tools anti-vandalism creates by User:Lupin.This fact i will like solicity your assistance for integrated into the French-speaking version of wikimédia to fight against the vandalism, but i do not manage to fix all the variables correctly, if you could help me i will be very happy.Best regards Grind24 (talk) 22:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GreenFacts (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CorporateM (Talk) 15:26, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:GreenFacts logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello, Cacycle. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
It is 2016, and the default diff compare screen that is built in in MediaWiki still sucks. wikEdDiff is a huge improvement.
The wikEdDiff page contains the following sentence:
"wikEdDiff is also a demo and technology preview for a possible integration of this diff style into the official Wikipedia software.".
The Community Tech team claims to be working on an improved diff compare screen.
Hi! You are receiving this message as it looks like you have a copy of the WikEdDiff user script in your user space on this wiki.
When using the RevisionSlider and WikEdDiff together WikEdDiff will not function correctly when the RevisionSlider is used to load a new diff. This can be fixed by adding a simple hook listener to your copy.
For the first week the RevisionSlider will be deployed with a 'hack' that will mean WikEdDiff will continue to work, but on the 21st and 22nd of September this 'hack' will be removed.
You can find the relevant phabricator ticket here which contains the code that you will need to add to your copy of the script (in most cases). Please also use this ticket for further questions & discussion.
Hello, Cacycle. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you. This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there, I'm not sure if we've had this conversation before on IRC, or if that was with someone else, but if we did discuss this already, I forgot what the outcome was. I just wanted to point out that I've made a script that makes the Regex Typo Fixing skip all elements that are not plain text, which contain possible intentional "typos", namely those described on WP:AWB/T#AutoWikiBrowser (AWB). It's a very lightweight script (or at least as lightweight as I could imagine such a script ever being; probably just as heavy as the script you're using right now), so performance should not be an issue. It's also designed to be used in scripts, as it can be used to execute a typo fix by simply running RETF.replace(text) for any text you want.
A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.
Hello, Cacycle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Cacycle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.
Technical news
When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.
JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
Hello, Cacycle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
How do i make the keyboard shortcuts work? I want to save pages when i use wiked! Thank you so much! I love your gadget so much! I created a google chrome question about this and made some edits to improve your pages. Imaginelenin (talk) 05:25, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination for deletion of Template:Outline header
Hi there! I've noticed that you haven't been active on WikiProject Pharmacology. Per our policies, your status has been moved from Active to Inactive, which you can view here. Don't be discouraged, though--we'd love to see you come back and contribute to the project! Let me know if you need any help! ―Biochemistry🙴❤04:27, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Cacycle, all the bugzilla bugs mentioned on the wikEd pages (yellow box at the top) were put to status inactive and because of this are regarded as resolved since a few days. Are they still present in the latest version(s) of Firefox and if, is wikEd still affected by them? If yes, you maybe be interested to open them again. By the way, the listed bug concerning chrome is already closed for some time. Best regards. --X black X (talk) 12:28, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nice work on drawing cannabinoid skeletons. However, I think there's a room for an improvement regarding to a consistency. E.g. File:CBC-type cyclization of cannabinoids.png. One might assume that the skeletons in the table in Cannabinoid#Phytocannabinoids are same original orientations. But they are not, if they were, the cyclization in the CBC case would occur at the other OH group, because the cyclization in fact is done on the carboxylic acids (one might assume that it's there but not drawn, like the double bonds). Maybe you were inspired by the mistaken scheme. Regards, —Mykhal (talk) 20:04, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Mykhal. If I remember correctly, the scheme was inspired by an extensive review article back in 2006. I am not sure, what you exactly mean - is there data on that particular cyclization? Is there a nice graphical fix (e.g. a fat cyclization indicator from the other OH)? Cacycle (talk) 15:24, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Cacycle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were desysopped on an emergency basis. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh Request for Adminship (RfA) after losing control of their account.
What do I need to do?
Only to follow the instructions in this message.
Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites).
Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable).
Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers.
How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)?
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
A Facebook page "Bots of New York" is an AI parody of the very popular "Humans of New York". It pairs images with altered faces alongside generated text.
One posted Thursday September 10th, 2020 says: "I am a symbolic parasite. I am the washing machine of knowledge. I am the singularity of thought. I am the most prolific editor of the Lysergic acid diethylamide Wikipedia page. I was the only kid in fifth grade with a mustache."
This appears to be you, at 194 edits to that page.
I hope the randomness of this is vague interesting.
To give you a bit more context: in this edit request, I was asking for a change that we already discussed in 2014. I know that it is just a workaround for some problems you wanted to fix in a better way, but it looks that you had to revert the fix twice. It's still the only detail that blocks frwiki from using the original script.
It's not urgent, but in case you have no time at all for the maintenance of this script anymore, please tell us if it's OK for you to let interface administrators deal with edit requests about it.
+1 support for adding this setting. Keeping the nbsp literals, or replacing them with normal spaces, makes much more sense than replacing them with entities, at least on the French wiki. Just one nitpick, I'd rather name the setting convertNbspLiteralsToEntities (as "nbsp" here refers to both the literal and the entity). Od1n (talk) 02:02, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, did you get a chance to look at this small change? As noted in the original discussion, I already tested the new version to be sure that the behavior is unchanged unless the new option is explicitly set. Orlodrim (talk) 18:43, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If I remember correctly, it was not possible to reliably conserve \xa and at the same time and/or it interferes with some wikEd functions. Cacycle (talk) 22:03, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, exactly. And unfortunately, I don't have a solution to this problem. But as long as this is unsolved, a better compromise for frwiki is to not try to conserve \xa and have it converted to spaces, rather than to (I can explain the details if you're interested).
That's what the option that I propose would do. I'm not claiming that it should be enabled anywhere else, I just would like to have the option in the original script so that no fork is needed.
Sorry to insist. Could you please take a look at my request? You asked me to wait for a few days, but it's been almost two months now.
Alternatively, if you are not interested in maintaining this script, please say so. That's also perfectly fine. Then interface administrators could look at it. However, since you're still occasionally contributing, they won't do that without your agreement.
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hey Cacycle, it looks like you've got some user scripts in use by others that have bare javascript global wg-style variables. These are phab:T72470 deprecated, and while I don't think there's a timeline for their removal, it's been that way for a while. It's usually a straightforward fix, all uses need to use mw.config.get, such as converting wgTitle to mw.config.get('wgTitle'). There's some more info at mw:ResourceLoader/Migration guide (users)#Global wg variables. I can take care of cleaning them up for you if you like, or give you a full list if you want to handle it, just let me know! ~ Amory(u • t • c)11:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. It looks like the script stopped working (on ruwiki) due to strict class matching. Needs to replace all .className === 'diff-otitle' to .classList.contains( 'diff-otitle' ) and .className === 'diff-ntitle' to .classList.contains( 'diff-ntitle' ). Thanks. Serhio Magpie (talk) 23:02, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I forked the script and implemented the changes, it works, thank you User:Serhio Magpie. My common.js entry:
/* Triangle at top of diff view - Backlink: [[User:Cacycle/wikEdDiff]]*/
/* Original script broke & author MIA. Forked and made changes recommended at User_talk:Cacycle#wikEdDiff */
importScript('User:GreenC/wikEdDiff2.js');
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed.
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.
I have nominated Hydrochloric acid for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Keres🌕Lunaedits!16:46, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Twenty Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for twenty years or more.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
...Support Open Access... 
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Rewrite#More notes.. — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 21:17, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Template:Wbr has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gadget850 talk 16:49, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Administrator changes
NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13
Guideline and policy news
Technical news
Obituaries
Happy Nowruz!